Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles |
AQM-35 |
AQM/BQM/MQM/BGM-34 MQM-36 |
Copyright © 2002-2003 Andreas Parsch |
In 1953, Northrop's Radioplane division started the development of the Model RP-61 supersonic target drone, and in June 1954 the USAF awarded a contract for the Q-4 vehicle under project MX-2144. The first air launch of an XQ-4 aircraft occurred in January 1956, and although the XQ-4 had a ground-launch capability, this was never used.
The XQ-4 was powered by an XJ81-WE-3 turbojet engine, and could reach a speed of Mach 1.55. It was air-launched by B-50D or GC-130A aircraft, and was controlled by a radio-command guidance system. The drone was tracked by radar, and a telemetry system was used to transmit flight parameters in real time. The XQ-4 could be recovered by a three-stage parachute system and was equipped with four inflatable bags which softened the landing to prevent damage to the airframe. The Q-4 was planned to be used to test various types of air-to-air and surface-to-air missiles designed for use against supersonic enemy aircraft. Optionally, it could also be fitted with photographic or TV reconnaissance equipment.
![]() |
Photo: USAF |
XQ-4 |
The XQ-4A was specifically designed to meet the radar-appearance requirements for testing the IM-99/CIM-10 Bomarc missile. It was to use the Fairchild J83 engine, but was cancelled when the latter didn't become available in time. In February 1959, the USAF awarded Radioplane a contract for the much improved Q-4B model, and the first flight of an XQ-4B occurred in March 1961. Some sources state that the XQ-4B vehicles were actually built by Bendix. The XQ-4B had improved performance using the significantly more powerful J85-GE-5 engine and a slightly redesigned airframe.
![]() |
Photo: Northrop |
XQ-4B (AQM-35B) |
In June 1963, the Q-4 and Q-4B were redesignated as AQM-35A and AQM-35B, respectively. However, the Q-4/AQM-35 never became fully operational with the USAF, and only 25 XQ-4/Q-4B missiles were built. Quoted reasons for the cancellation include problems during development and flight-test, and the fact that the AQM-35's performance was too high for the surface-to-air missiles of the early 1960s anyway. The AQM-35 had apparently been removed from the inventory by the mid-1960s.
Note: There are a few sources which call the AQM-35 the "Bendix Talos" and/or refer to RIM-35A or RTM-35A designations. I don't know the origin of these reports, but they are certainly erroneous. There is no way a variant of the AQM-35 could have been built as a ship-launched interceptor missile, and I strongly suspect some major confusion between the Bendix-built AQM-35B and that company's RIM-8 Talos ship-based air-defense missile.
Note: Data given by several sources show slight variations. Figures given below may therefore be inaccurate!
Data for XQ-4, Q-4B (AQM-35B):
XQ-4 | Q-4B (AQM-35B) | |
Length | 10.06 m (33 ft) | 10.77 m (35 ft 4 in) |
Wingspan | 3.38 m (11 ft 1 in) | 3.86 m (12 ft 8 in) |
Diameter | 51 cm (20 in) | |
Height | 1.69 m (5 ft 6.7 in) | 1.88 m (6 ft 2 in) |
Weight | 900 kg (1985 kg) | 1540 kg (3400 lb) |
Speed | Mach 1.55 | Mach 2 |
Ceiling | 18300 m (60000 ft) | 21300 m (70000 ft) |
Propulsion | Westinghouse XJ81-WE-3 turbojet; 8.0 kN (1810 lb) | General Electric J85-GE-5 turbojet; 17.1 kN (3850 lb) |
[1] Richard A. Botzum: "50 Years of Target Drone Aircraft", Northrop, 1985
[2] Frederick I. Ordway III, Ronald C. Wakeford: "International Missile and Spacecraft Guide", McGraw-Hill, 1960
[3] Norman J. Bowman: "The Handbook of Rockets and Guided Missiles", Perastadion Press, 1963
Back to Current Designations Of U.S. Unmanned Military Aerospace Vehicles
Back to
Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles